The leading public health organisations engaged with Rethink Sugary Drink are standing in solidarity with the Australian Medical Association (AMA), who has renewed its call for Australia to introduce a health levy on sugary drinks in a new report.
AMA’s Why tax sugary drinks? report highlights that Australia is lagging behind 85 countries and jurisdictions across the globe that already have a health levy in place, as well as the evidence which shows the policy can effectively reduce demand for and consumption of sugary drinks.
Craig Sinclair, director of prevention at Cancer Council Victoria, said that introducing a levy on sugary drinks can help improve Australian’s oral health and reduce obesity – a major risk factor for chronic diseases like Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and some cancers.
“Australians drink more than 2.4 billion litres of sugary drinks every year. A health levy on sugary drinks could hit two birds with one stone – it sends a price signal to consumers that the product is unhealthy while encouraging manufacturers to reduce the amount of sugar packed into their products,” Mr Sinclair said.
“Australian research estimates that a 20 per cent health levy on sugary drinks would result in 16,000 fewer cases of Type 2 diabetes, 4400 fewer cases of heart disease and 1100 fewer cases of stroke over a 25-year period.”
In addition to helping prevent chronic disease and promote better oral health, evidence shows that a health levy on sugary drinks would also be supported widely by the community.
“Year on year, we see the processed food companies spend millions pushing these sugary drinks onto consumers. They prioritise their profits above the community’s health,” Mr Sinclair said.
“Yet we know more than three in four people (77 per cent) would support a sugary drink levy if funds raised were reinvested into obesity prevention efforts.”
Countries that have successfully implemented the levy abroad include Mexico, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. In Mexico, a levy introduced in 2014 led to a 37 per cent reduction in the number of sugar sweetened beverages purchased in 2016. A levy introduced in the UK in 2018 led to many brands reformulating the amount of added sugar in their products.
Mr Sinclair said that in the Australian context, a levy would particularly benefit teenagers and young adults, especially men, who are currently the biggest cohort of sugary drink consumers.
“Some young people consume as much as 1.5 litres of sugary drinks per day. This price-sensitive audience would be especially responsive to a levy and their health will be better off in the long-run because of it,” he said.
“With estimates suggesting that a 20 per cent health levy could generate $814 million annually, there are clear health and economic benefits that we can no longer ignore.
“It’s a win-win. Government must take action now to protect the health of all Australians.”
Rethink Sugary Drink is a partnership between 20 leading public health organisations across Australia, including Cancer Council Victoria and the Australian Medical Association, who are all committed to tackling the overconsumption of sugary drinks.
Visit www.rethinksugarydrink.org.au for more information, as well as facts, tips and resources to help you or someone you know cut back on their sugar consumption.
